| Cardiovascular Exchange Summit 2011 |
| | Association of hypertension with absolute and relative risk of stroke and MI |
|
| Benefits of antihypertensive treatment is proportional to reduction in blood pressure |
| | Benefits of antihypertensive treatment is proportional to reduction in blood pressure |
|
| Deciles of Blood Pressure |
| | Deciles of Blood Pressure Variability |
|
| Patients with episodic hypertension have a high risk of stroke |
| | Dia 8 |
|
| ACE-I or ARB beneficial in normotensive atherosclerotic patients |
| | Care pathway |
|
| Care pathway |
| | Care pathway |
|
| Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease |
| | Normal Pressure |
|
| High Pressure due to Constriction |
| | High PressureDue to Increased Volume |
|
| Evidence for two types of hypertension and response to drugs |
| | Comparison of four classes of antihypertensive treatments |
|
| Correlations between drug pairs |
| | Two types of hypertension:Type 1 (high-renin, vasoconstrictor) |
|
| Two types of drugs for hypertension:Type 1(‘AB’ drugs) |
| | Two types of drugs for hypertension:Type 1(‘AB’ drugs) |
|
| Two types of hypertension:Type 2 (low-renin, Na+ dependent) |
| | Two types of hypertension:Type 2 (low-renin, Na+ dependent) |
|
| Two types of drugs for hypertension:Type 2 (‘CD’ drugs) |
| | AB/CD Rule for optimisation of antihypertensive treatment |
|
| | Rationale for study |
|
| Effect of Dose and Combination of Antihypertensives on Interindividual Blood Pressure Variability |
| | Rationale for study |
|
| Rationale for study |
| | Rationale for study |
|
| | Cambridge ‘abD’ guideline |
|
| Spironolactone as 4th line treatment in ASCOT |
| | Slaying medical myths: Low-dose thiazides are not maximal |
|
| Double-blind, dose-ranging crossover comparison of diuretics in low-renin hypertension |
| | Crossover comparison of glucose tolerance on amiloride and HCTZ |
|
| The choice of diuretic in hypertension |
| | Summary |
|
Deel deze pagina met collega's en vrienden: